Ryzen 5 3500U vs A12 9720P
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 9720P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 9720P gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.2 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 9720P gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.2 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
660f51
Core
Picasso
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA FP4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
28.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
65.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
10.13k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
13.41k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
2.9k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
1.94k (x0.58)
TOTAL
36.64k
28.37k (x0.77)
Multithread
3500U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
26.79k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
27.87k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
8.23k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
2.37k (x0.6)
TOTAL
140.97k
65.26k (x0.46)
Performance/W
3500U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1786 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
1858 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
548 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
158 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
4351 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
805 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
538 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
7880 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4