Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-6900K
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406f1
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
23.11k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
17.84k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.34k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
3.47k (x0.55)
TOTAL
50.25k
49.76k (x0.99)
Multithread
3400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
184.19k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
181.2k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
47.44k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
14.69k (x2.08)
TOTAL
200.34k
427.51k (x2.13)
Performance/W
3400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4