Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-10610U
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
23.1k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
20k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.61k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
8.94k (x1.41)
TOTAL
50.25k
56.65k (x1.13)
Multithread
3400G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
73.36k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
68.28k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
13.73k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
6.62k (x0.94)
TOTAL
200.34k
162k (x0.81)
Performance/W
3400G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4