Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 2.9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 2.9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306d4
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
13.58k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
12.14k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
3.18k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
2.92k (x0.46)
TOTAL
50.25k
31.81k (x0.63)
Multithread
3400G
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
28.89k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
28.74k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
7.31k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
3.74k (x0.53)
TOTAL
200.34k
68.69k (x0.34)
Performance/W
3400G
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4