Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
26.37k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
23.91k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.57k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
11.68k (x1.84)
TOTAL
50.25k
67.53k (x1.34)
Multithread
3400G
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
114.08k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
114.71k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
27.33k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
4.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
200.34k
260.38k (x1.3)
Performance/W
3400G
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4