Ryzen 5 3400G vs Engineering Sample 906EC
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 906EC is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 2.5 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 2.5 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ec
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
494.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
28.3k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
24.99k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.55k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
11.71k (x1.85)
TOTAL
50.25k
70.55k (x1.4)
Multithread
3400G
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
229.27k (x4)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
209.21k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
48.53k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
7.23k (x1.03)
TOTAL
200.34k
494.24k (x2.47)
Performance/W
3400G
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W