Ryzen 5 3400G vs 4600H
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
15.48k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
22.82k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
8.63k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
7.17k (x1.13)
TOTAL
50.25k
54.11k (x1.08)
Multithread
3400G
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
117.98k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
146.43k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
65.54k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
4.77k (x0.68)
TOTAL
200.34k
334.72k (x1.67)
Performance/W
3400G
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4