Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906a4
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
10240 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
185.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
37.56k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
21.13k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
11.35k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
10.31k (x1.63)
TOTAL
50.25k
80.34k (x1.6)
Multithread
3400G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
73.97k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
72.37k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
29.61k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
9.65k (x1.37)
TOTAL
200.34k
185.6k (x0.93)
Performance/W
3400G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
12374 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4