Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i3-12100F
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
90675
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
39.54k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
23.79k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
11.96k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
13.52k (x2.13)
TOTAL
50.25k
88.81k (x1.77)
Multithread
3400G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
148k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
123.08k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
52.73k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
16.67k (x2.37)
TOTAL
200.34k
340.49k (x1.7)
Performance/W
3400G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4