Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
30.38k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
27.95k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
6.51k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
14.37k (x0.78)
TOTAL
66.44k
79.2k (x1.19)
Multithread
2600X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
216.18k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
210.82k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
51.57k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
8.47k (x0.83)
TOTAL
333.12k
487.05k (x1.46)
Performance/W
2600X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4