Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-10105
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0653
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
28.9k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
25.85k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
5.88k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
8.29k (x0.45)
TOTAL
66.44k
68.92k (x1.04)
Multithread
2600X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
111.69k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
110.23k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
28.45k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
3.56k (x0.35)
TOTAL
333.12k
253.93k (x0.76)
Performance/W
2600X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4