| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806d0
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
30.84k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
12.66k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
11.74k (x0.64)
TOTAL
66.44k
81.62k (x1.23)

Multithread

2600X

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
294.86k (x3.12)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
280.92k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
113.9k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
20.16k (x1.99)
TOTAL
333.12k
709.85k (x2.13)

Performance/W
2600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4