Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a20f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
24.34k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.8k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
12.12k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
26.55k (x1.44)
TOTAL
66.44k
89.82k (x1.35)
Multithread
2600X
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
263.12k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
353.9k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
159.07k (x3.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
64.01k (x6.31)
TOTAL
333.12k
840.11k (x2.52)
Performance/W
2600X
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4