Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
21.2k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
25k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
11.44k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
24.22k (x1.31)
TOTAL
66.44k
81.87k (x1.23)
Multithread
2600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
145.13k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
198.36k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
85.67k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
5.79k (x0.57)
TOTAL
333.12k
434.96k (x1.31)
Performance/W
2600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4