| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 7730U


Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 7730U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 7730U gets 345.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7730U is 1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
60.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
345.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
13.41k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
19.44k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
8.41k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
18.92k (x1.02)
TOTAL
66.44k
60.18k (x0.91)

Multithread

2600X

7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
108.82k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
162.53k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
69.08k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
4.98k (x0.49)
TOTAL
333.12k
345.4k (x1.04)

Performance/W
2600X
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
7254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
10835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
4605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
332 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
23027 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600X
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
2979 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
4319 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
13372 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4