| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
20.37k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
22.52k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
10.18k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
21.49k (x1.16)
TOTAL
66.44k
74.56k (x1.12)

Multithread

2600X

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
144.01k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
191.86k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
84.53k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
6.5k (x0.64)
TOTAL
333.12k
426.9k (x1.28)

Performance/W
2600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4