Ryzen 5 2600X vs 5625U
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
18.57k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
22.03k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
9.55k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
20.5k (x1.11)
TOTAL
66.44k
70.65k (x1.06)
Multithread
2600X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
92.92k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
128.4k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
54.82k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
5.13k (x0.51)
TOTAL
333.12k
281.26k (x0.84)
Performance/W
2600X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4