| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600X vs 3500X


Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
870f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
15.48k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
22.91k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
7.1k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
21.11k (x1.14)
TOTAL
66.44k
66.61k (x1)

Multithread

2600X

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
90.39k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
139.1k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
53.2k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
90.92k (x8.96)
TOTAL
333.12k
373.61k (x1.12)

Performance/W
2600X
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600X
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4