Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-12700H
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.9 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.9 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
95 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
643.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
41.64k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
25.48k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
13.2k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
12.8k (x0.69)
TOTAL
66.44k
93.12k (x1.4)
Multithread
2600X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
276.56k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
251.6k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
104.55k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
10.58k (x1.04)
TOTAL
333.12k
643.29k (x1.93)
Performance/W
2600X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
5594 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4