Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a4
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
185.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
37.56k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
21.13k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
11.35k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
10.31k (x0.56)
TOTAL
66.44k
80.34k (x1.21)
Multithread
2600X
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
73.97k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
72.37k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
29.61k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
9.65k (x0.95)
TOTAL
333.12k
185.6k (x0.56)
Performance/W
2600X
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
12374 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4