Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
90675
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
330.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
43.24k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
23.76k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
12.67k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
13.88k (x0.75)
TOTAL
66.44k
93.54k (x1.41)
Multithread
2600X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
150.28k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
126.29k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
45.32k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
8.73k (x0.86)
TOTAL
333.12k
330.62k (x0.99)
Performance/W
2600X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4