| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
50657
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8448 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.97k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
14.5k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.78k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
8.19k (x0.47)
TOTAL
41.47k
31.45k (x0.76)

Multithread

2600

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
15.56k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
59.23k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
22.87k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.85k (x1.03)
TOTAL
177.16k
104.51k (x0.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
25.09k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
20.76k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.07k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
8.76k (x0.58)
TOTAL
57.13k
59.68k (x1.04)

Multithread

2600

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
111.43k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
100.2k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
24.67k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.89k (x1.02)
TOTAL
291.53k
243.18k (x0.83)

Performance/W
2600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4