Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon W3550
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the W3550 is based on .
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the W3550 gets 47.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.8 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the W3550 gets 47.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.8 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
106a5
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /4
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
73.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
2.3k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
5.21k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.31k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
3.09k (x0.18)
TOTAL
41.47k
13.92k (x0.34)
Multithread
2600
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
8.75k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
19.8k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
12.38k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.17k (x0.93)
TOTAL
177.16k
47.09k (x0.27)
Performance/W
2600
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
67 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
152 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
604 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
2726 points/W
362 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4092 points/GHz
1564 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4466 points/GHz
928 points/GHz
TOTAL
10633 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4