Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 2.4 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 2.4 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
306e4
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
12 /24
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.44k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
9.54k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.21k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
3.94k (x0.23)
TOTAL
41.47k
21.13k (x0.51)
Multithread
2600
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
73.17k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
230.83k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
107.14k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
7.99k (x1.2)
TOTAL
177.16k
419.12k (x2.37)
Performance/W
2600
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
563 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
604 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
2726 points/W
3224 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4092 points/GHz
2726 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4466 points/GHz
1126 points/GHz
TOTAL
10633 points/GHz
6036 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4