Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-1065G7
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
706e5
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
214.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
28.19k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.13k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.32k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
14.17k (x0.93)
TOTAL
57.13k
74.82k (x1.31)
Multithread
2600
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
86.39k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
86.22k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
32.99k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
8.75k (x1.3)
TOTAL
291.53k
214.34k (x0.74)
Performance/W
2600
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
14289 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4