Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-10610U
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806ec
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
23.1k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
20k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.61k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
8.94k (x0.59)
TOTAL
57.13k
56.65k (x0.99)
Multithread
2600
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
73.36k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
68.28k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
13.73k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.62k (x0.98)
TOTAL
291.53k
162k (x0.56)
Performance/W
2600
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4