Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-8365U
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806ec
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
197.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
24.37k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.68k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.98k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
7.7k (x0.51)
TOTAL
57.13k
59.73k (x1.05)
Multithread
2600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
89.45k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
85.57k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
19.02k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
3.41k (x0.51)
TOTAL
291.53k
197.46k (x0.68)
Performance/W
2600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
13164 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4