| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-8250U


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806ea
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
53.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
153.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.32k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
13.5k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.11k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
7.42k (x0.43)
TOTAL
41.47k
28.34k (x0.68)

Multithread

2600

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
13.97k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
50.8k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
14.71k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
4.76k (x0.71)
TOTAL
177.16k
84.24k (x0.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
22k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
19.55k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.41k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
7.83k (x0.51)
TOTAL
57.13k
53.8k (x0.94)

Multithread

2600

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
70.15k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
63.27k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
15.29k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
4.8k (x0.71)
TOTAL
291.53k
153.5k (x0.53)

Performance/W
2600
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
4676 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
4218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1019 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
10233 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2304 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
15823 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4