Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0653
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
27.46k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
24.28k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.65k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
11.92k (x0.78)
TOTAL
57.13k
69.31k (x1.21)
Multithread
2600
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
165.5k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
156.32k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
39.88k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
5.96k (x0.89)
TOTAL
291.53k
367.65k (x1.26)
Performance/W
2600
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4