Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-4160
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.4 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.4 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
306c3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.13k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
10.33k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.64k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
3.95k (x0.23)
TOTAL
41.47k
23.06k (x0.56)
Multithread
2600
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
7.46k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
26.62k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
11.46k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.27k (x0.94)
TOTAL
177.16k
51.81k (x0.29)
Performance/W
2600
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
604 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
2726 points/W
959 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4092 points/GHz
2869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4466 points/GHz
1098 points/GHz
TOTAL
10633 points/GHz
6405 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4