| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.31k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
17.51k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
10.53k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
23.57k (x1.35)
TOTAL
41.47k
55.92k (x1.35)

Multithread

2600

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
24.18k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
117.98k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
70.96k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
8.08k (x1.21)
TOTAL
177.16k
221.19k (x1.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
20.37k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.52k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.18k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
21.49k (x1.41)
TOTAL
57.13k
74.56k (x1.3)

Multithread

2600

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
144.01k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
191.86k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
84.53k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
291.53k
426.9k (x1.46)

Performance/W
2600
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4