| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
Both models 2600 and 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition are based on Zen+ architecture.

Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.7 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f81
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
13.77k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.62k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.91k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
4k (x0.26)
TOTAL
57.13k
45.3k (x0.79)

Multithread

2600

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
50.44k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
94k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
25.64k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
4.11k (x0.61)
TOTAL
291.53k
174.19k (x0.6)

Performance/W
2600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4