Ryzen 5 2600 vs 3400G
Description
Both models 2600 and 3400G are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f81
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
14.58k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
23.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.35k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
6.34k (x0.42)
TOTAL
57.13k
50.25k (x0.88)
Multithread
2600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
57.37k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
107.03k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
28.9k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
7.05k (x1.05)
TOTAL
291.53k
200.34k (x0.69)
Performance/W
2600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4