| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 6 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
b0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
9.77k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
24.52k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
17.17k (x3.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
21.37k (x1.23)
TOTAL
41.47k
72.83k (x1.76)

Multithread

2600

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
145.21k (x6.95)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
444.95k (x4.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
318.3k (x8.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
27.2k (x4.08)
TOTAL
177.16k
935.66k (x5.28)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
58.6k (x4.26)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
33.29k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
17.77k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
19.49k (x1.28)
TOTAL
57.13k
129.15k (x2.26)

Multithread

2600

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
804.04k (x9.66)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
613.45k (x3.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
311.08k (x7.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
34.5k (x5.13)
TOTAL
291.53k
1763.08k (x6.05)

Performance/W
2600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4