Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-13900HX
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
b0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
877.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
49.8k (x3.62)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
26.07k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
13.65k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
15.38k (x1.01)
TOTAL
57.13k
104.9k (x1.84)
Multithread
2600
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
375.69k (x4.51)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
329.21k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
157.71k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
14.89k (x2.21)
TOTAL
291.53k
877.5k (x3.01)
Performance/W
2600
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
15955 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4