Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-1255U
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-1255U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-1255U gets 258.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1255U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-1255U gets 258.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1255U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a4
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
81.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
258.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
38.32k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
21.35k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
11.2k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
10.86k (x0.71)
TOTAL
57.13k
81.73k (x1.43)
Multithread
2600
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
105.48k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
100.18k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
43.39k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
9.26k (x1.38)
TOTAL
291.53k
258.31k (x0.89)
Performance/W
2600
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
7032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
6678 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
617 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
17221 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
8154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
17390 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4