Ryzen 5 2400G vs N100
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
b06e0
Core
Raven Ridge
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
15.23k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
11.04k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.54k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
4.98k (x0.96)
TOTAL
47.96k
36.79k (x0.77)
Multithread
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
37.07k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
32.57k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
14.75k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.9k (x0.7)
TOTAL
198.27k
88.29k (x0.45)
Performance/W
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4