Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
50657
Core
Raven Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
25.97k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.37k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.3k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
8.63k (x1.67)
TOTAL
47.96k
62.28k (x1.3)
Multithread
2400G
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
281.98k (x4.84)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
259.01k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
64.87k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
26.5k (x4.74)
TOTAL
198.27k
632.35k (x3.19)
Performance/W
2400G
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4