Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-6900K
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
406f1
Core
Raven Ridge
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
23.11k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
17.84k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.34k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.47k (x0.67)
TOTAL
47.96k
49.76k (x1.04)
Multithread
2400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
184.19k (x3.16)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
181.2k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
47.44k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
14.69k (x2.63)
TOTAL
198.27k
427.51k (x2.16)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4