Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-5960X
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306f2
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
294.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
6.6k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
3.8k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
1.41k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
1.34k (x0.26)
TOTAL
47.96k
13.16k (x0.27)
Multithread
2400G
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
146.65k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
100.72k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
34.09k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
12.83k (x2.3)
TOTAL
198.27k
294.29k (x1.48)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
2102 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4