Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a0652
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
349.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.69k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
18.71k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.84k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
13.95k (x4.41)
TOTAL
29.52k
43.19k (x1.46)
Multithread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
18.79k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
86.1k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
27.42k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.27k (x1.75)
TOTAL
122.2k
137.58k (x1.13)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.63k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
24.17k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
6.38k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
13.69k (x4.52)
TOTAL
43.01k
60.87k (x1.42)
Multithread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
67.07k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
107.95k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
27.05k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.07k (x1.71)
TOTAL
183.04k
207.14k (x1.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.71k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
25.45k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
6.06k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
13.2k (x3.88)
TOTAL
44.15k
61.43k (x1.39)
Multithread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
67.59k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
111.94k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
27.7k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
5.3k (x1.74)
TOTAL
188.49k
212.53k (x1.13)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
29.06k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
26.49k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
6.23k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
13.89k (x2.68)
TOTAL
47.96k
75.67k (x1.58)
Multithread
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
154.61k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
151.34k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
36.33k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.93k (x1.24)
TOTAL
198.27k
349.21k (x1.76)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4