Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
143.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.68k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
16.08k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.99k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
7.95k (x2.51)
TOTAL
29.52k
32.69k (x1.11)
Multithread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
14.29k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
61.15k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
16.53k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.72k (x1.23)
TOTAL
122.2k
95.69k (x0.78)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.6k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
20.03k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
5.19k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
7.05k (x2.33)
TOTAL
43.01k
45.87k (x1.07)
Multithread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
51.42k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
77.48k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
16.65k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.69k (x1.24)
TOTAL
183.04k
149.24k (x0.82)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
13.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
21.17k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
8.11k (x2.39)
TOTAL
44.15k
47.94k (x1.09)
Multithread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
51.36k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
79.72k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
16.61k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.75k (x1.23)
TOTAL
188.49k
151.44k (x0.8)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
19.19k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
17.47k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.04k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
5.97k (x1.15)
TOTAL
47.96k
46.67k (x0.97)
Multithread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
64.43k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
61.91k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
13.36k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.52k (x0.63)
TOTAL
198.27k
143.23k (x0.72)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4