Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806eb
Core
Raven Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
24.32k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
20.35k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.38k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
8.52k (x1.65)
TOTAL
47.96k
57.57k (x1.2)
Multithread
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
65.17k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
63.6k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
14.4k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.31k (x1.13)
TOTAL
198.27k
149.48k (x0.75)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4