| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-6600K


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-6600K is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the i5-6600K gets 209.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6600K is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
506e3
Core
Raven Ridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
59.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
209.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
17.24k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
26.5k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
6.45k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
9.09k (x2.68)
TOTAL
44.15k
59.28k (x1.34)

Multithread

2400G

i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
68.47k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
105.05k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
25.24k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
10.5k (x3.45)
TOTAL
188.49k
209.28k (x1.11)

Performance/W
2400G
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
721 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
1106 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
266 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
2203 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
4420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
6795 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
15199 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4