Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-5675R
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
40671
Core
Raven Ridge
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
194.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.14k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
14.35k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.94k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
5.47k (x1.73)
TOTAL
29.52k
28.91k (x0.98)
Multithread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
16.02k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
54.6k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
18.69k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
16.87k (x5.59)
TOTAL
122.2k
106.18k (x0.87)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
12.86k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
16.85k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
5.19k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
5.49k (x1.82)
TOTAL
43.01k
40.39k (x0.94)
Multithread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
50.07k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
64.61k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
19.84k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
17.09k (x5.74)
TOTAL
183.04k
151.6k (x0.83)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
12.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
18.27k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.12k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
5.45k (x1.6)
TOTAL
44.15k
41.72k (x0.94)
Multithread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
49.91k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
70.3k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
19.69k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
16.92k (x5.57)
TOTAL
188.49k
156.83k (x0.83)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
21.91k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
18.59k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.2k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
5.72k (x1.11)
TOTAL
47.96k
51.43k (x1.07)
Multithread
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
84.92k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
72.09k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
20.13k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
17.07k (x3.05)
TOTAL
198.27k
194.2k (x0.98)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4