Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-1035G1
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
706e5
Core
Raven Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
171.65k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
14.98k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.7k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
8.6k (x2.72)
TOTAL
29.52k
37.15k (x1.26)
Multithread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
14.61k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
54.9k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
27.58k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.04k (x1.67)
TOTAL
122.2k
102.13k (x0.84)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
12.89k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
18.55k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
9.93k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
9.54k (x3.15)
TOTAL
43.01k
50.91k (x1.18)
Multithread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
50.06k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
66.1k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
20.24k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.51k (x1.85)
TOTAL
183.04k
141.91k (x0.78)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
13.58k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
19.53k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
9.37k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
9.23k (x2.72)
TOTAL
44.15k
51.7k (x1.17)
Multithread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
56.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
73.73k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
29.56k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
5.39k (x1.77)
TOTAL
188.49k
164.94k (x0.88)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
21.5k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
17.71k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
7.92k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
8.24k (x1.59)
TOTAL
47.96k
55.37k (x1.15)
Multithread
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
73.03k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
68.19k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
24.89k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.54k (x0.99)
TOTAL
198.27k
171.65k (x0.87)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
11443 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4