Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806ec
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
23.11k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
20.58k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.73k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
7.43k (x1.44)
TOTAL
47.96k
55.86k (x1.16)
Multithread
2400G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
65.84k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
60.77k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
14.45k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
4.44k (x0.8)
TOTAL
198.27k
145.51k (x0.73)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4