Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 7800X3D is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a60f12
Core
Raven Ridge
Raphael
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM5
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
98304 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
704.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
36.77k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
23.4k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
14.8k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
29.28k (x5.66)
TOTAL
47.96k
104.26k (x2.17)
Multithread
2400G
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
249.4k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
167.65k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
104.85k (x3.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
182.98k (x32.75)
TOTAL
198.27k
704.89k (x3.56)
Performance/W
2400G
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
5874 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4