| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
a50f00
Core
Raven Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.31k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
17.51k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
10.53k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
23.57k (x7.45)
TOTAL
29.52k
55.92k (x1.89)

Multithread

2400G

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
24.18k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
117.98k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
70.96k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
8.08k (x2.68)
TOTAL
122.2k
221.19k (x1.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
20.37k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.52k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
10.18k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
21.49k (x4.15)
TOTAL
47.96k
74.56k (x1.55)

Multithread

2400G

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
144.01k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
191.86k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
84.53k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.5k (x1.16)
TOTAL
198.27k
426.9k (x2.15)

Performance/W
2400G
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4