Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f82
Core
Raven Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.25k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
19.72k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.84k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
21.36k (x6.75)
TOTAL
29.52k
51.17k (x1.73)
Multithread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
35.04k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
181.42k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
64.86k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
8.21k (x2.72)
TOTAL
122.2k
289.54k (x2.37)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
15.22k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
24.12k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
5.87k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
21k (x6.94)
TOTAL
43.01k
66.21k (x1.54)
Multithread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
126.81k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
229.86k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
61.74k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
9.77k (x3.28)
TOTAL
183.04k
428.19k (x2.34)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
14.44k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
24.92k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.8k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
19.07k (x5.61)
TOTAL
44.15k
64.24k (x1.45)
Multithread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
122.01k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
220.34k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
59.89k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
9.9k (x3.26)
TOTAL
188.49k
412.13k (x2.19)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
15.34k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
25.75k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.79k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
17.95k (x3.47)
TOTAL
47.96k
64.83k (x1.35)
Multithread
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
123.07k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
239.3k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
60.6k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
8.18k (x1.46)
TOTAL
198.27k
431.14k (x2.17)
Performance/W
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4